I find letters from Lang imploring me not to kill Allan Quatermain。 But when he wrote Allan had already been killed; and how could the end of the story be altered? Besides his day was done and his tale told。 But he left others behind him。
Before finally leaving the subject of “Cleopatra” I will quote a couple of letters that I received from W。 E。 Henley。 I should here mention that I was well acquainted with this able and interesting man; some of whose poems will; I think; survive in our literature。
I remember once driving to the British Museum with him and Lang; or it may have been Gosse; or both of them; in a four…wheeled cab; to see some Japanese prints that were on show。 On the way I told him that personally I admired statuary; and especially Greek statuary; much more than I did pictorial art。 He was greatly astonished。
“I think it wonderful;” he said; “that you being what you are; and your work what it is; you should prefer form to colour。”
It seemed curious to him that a man who wrote romances should have other sides to his nature。 He was extremely fond of war and fighting; witness his Ode to the Sword; and at the club would insist upon my telling him stories by the yard about the Zulus and their blood…thirsty battles and customs。 With it all he was very domestic; and much attached to his “placens uxor” and the little girl whom; most unhappily; he lost。 The last note I ever received from him; written some years after our acquaintance had practically ceased; was on this sad subject。
The first of the three letters which I am going to quote is not on the subject of “Cleopatra” but in answer to one of mine expressing my admiration of his volume of verses。 As it is; however; the earliest in date it shall have preference。
June 9; 1888。
My dear Haggard; — I found yours at the Club last night。 I do care for your approbation very much; for I do not think I should have it if my verses hadn’t a kind of basis of life。
Lang hates ’em; I believe; and I shall tell him of your note with pride and glee。
For myself I prefer the “Life and Death” lot。 But the In Hospital sets forth a special experience and is; of course; of particular interest。
Always yours sincerely;
W。 E。 H。
The next letter is written from 11 Howard Place; Edinburgh; July 20; 1889。
My dear Haggard; — I got a week at Windermere and took “Cleopatra” with me。 I was alone; and I found her very good pany。
You were terribly handicapped by the inevitable parison; but you came off better (to be frank) than I’d expected you would。 The invention throughout is admirable — is good enough; indeed; to carry off the archaeology and the archaical style; though they are both large orders。
And in Charmion you have given us; I think; your best creation; or if not that; a creation fit to rank with Umslopogaas and the King in “Solomon’s Mines。” And you know that I mean a good deal when I say that。
I am glad to have read the book; and glad to have it by me to read again。 It has plenty of faults; but it has an abundance of promise and some excellent — some really excellent — achievement。 There is never a sign of exhaustion; but on the contrary no end of proof that you have scarce got into your stride。
Always yours;
W。 E。 H。
The third letter is evidently in answer to one of mine。 It is headed: The Scots Observer: A Record and Review; 2 Thistle Street; Edinburgh; July 26; 1889:
My dear Haggard; — It is pleasant to know that I have paid a very little of my debt。 I think the Romance and Fame in the current S。O。 will not displease you。 The writer is a strange; old; brilliant creature whom I have found here; and whose opinion is worth having。 Meanwhile; you may put down the attacks partly to envy (for you can’t deny that you’ve had a dam good innings) and partly to the inevitable reaction — for I don’t know that your admirers have praised you in quite the right way。 And you need bother yourself no more about them。 Why should you? You are bound to win; and you need not care three straws for anything they say。 You need only do your best; and leave the rest to time。
That I believe to be the right philosophy of things。 And so farewell。
Ever yours;
W。 E。 H。
Archer has just writ the loveliest review of my second edition; and the P。M。G。; after accepting and printing; declines to publish! So you see ——!
https://www.du8.org https://www.shuhuangxs.com www.baquge.ccabxsw.net dingdianshu.com bxwx9.net
kenshu.tw pashuba.com quanshu.la
tlxsw.cc qudushu.net zaidudu.org
duyidu.org baquge.cc kenshuge.cc
qushumi.com xepzw.com 3dllc.net